Note: With 38K views and 10K shares and growing, “Sensible Responses to White Nonsense” hit a nerve. There is clearly a need by white people to challengeÂ their peers on racist opinions that are (quite frankly) ridiculous. “Sensible Responses” is a smorgasbord of nonsense and responses. Yet each individual piece of nonsense also deserves its own spotlight and clearÂ talking points, beginning with this post.Â My hope is to nourish a groundswell of white people fighting white nonsense. This is our fight. This is our power.
Black Lives Matter is racist because they are “only concerning themselves with black victims of police violence”*
- No, they are not racist.
- To support oneÂ groupÂ is not inherently oppositional to other groups.
- When you show support for one group, it is because that group is suffering some particular injustice that requires attention and remedy.
- It is not because you oppose people who are not in that group.
1) Racism has a variety of definitions.
There are a variety of ways of defining the word racism. Â Some argue that â€œracism equals power.â€ According to this interpretation, black and other people of color can be biased or prejudiced, but they canâ€™t be racist. Â This is because, according to this interpretation, Racism = Bias based on skin color + Control over institutions that can do harm as a result of those biases. Â So a black person can be biased, but they cannot be racist because they lack control over institutions to do harm to white people as a result of thatÂ bias.
Howeverâ€¦ this is not the most commonÂ definition. Â The prevailing definition focuses exclusively on bias or individual treatment as a result of bias. Â The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, for example, definesÂ racism as both â€œpoor treatment of or violence against people because of their race,â€ which anyone could do, and â€œthe belief that some races of people are better than others,â€ which could also apply to a person of any skin color.
2)Â Fortunately, you can respond without choosing one.
Fortunately for logical argument,Â it is not necessary to resolve this definitional question to respond to the above criticism of Black Lives Matter.
3) To show support for oneÂ groupÂ is not inherently oppositional to other groups.
As to the question of whether Black Lives Matter holds some form of racial biasÂ because they care about black lives, I give a firm â€œno.â€ Â When you show support for one group, it is because that group is suffering some particular injustice that requires attention and remedy. Â It is not because you oppose people who are not in that group.
For example, if I am fighting for access to HIV treatment I am not inherently expressing bias towards people who are HIV-negative. If I am fighting for housing for homeless youth I am not inherently biased againstÂ adults with homes. Â If I am fighting forÂ animal welfareÂ I am not inherently anti-human. Â I am just expressing that these groups are experiencing a particular injustice that requires attention and remedy. Â I am lifting them up because I support them, not because I oppose others.
4)Â This is true even if someÂ black activists have (understandable) anti-white bias.
Even if some black activists do hold bias against white people (which, to be honest, I find quite understandable), fighting for the rights and welfare of black people is not in and of itself racist. Â They are uplifting the cause of black people because black people are subject to a range of injustices within our society.
5)Â Being passionate about one particular cause isn’t bias, it’s what drives activism.
The causes we care about are tied to our experiences, our identities, and who we love. Â Each of us must fight for the causes that move our hearts. Â This isnâ€™t bias. Â This is the engine of activism, human rights, and human progress.
* Denotes direct quote from a white person
original image:Â michaelhyatt.com